The Win-Win Benefits of Settlement Agreements for Employers and Employees

Table of Contents

• The Win-Win Benefits of Settlement Agreements for Employers and Employees
• Avoiding Pitfalls: Common Mistakes in Settlement Agreements and How to Recover
• Step-by-Step Guide to Creating an Effective Settlement Agreement
• Statistical Insights: How Settlement Agreements Shape Employment Dispute Resolution
• Busting Myths: What You Really Need to Know About Settlement Agreements in Employment Law
• Legal Foundations: Understanding the Basics of Settlement Agreements in Employment
• Future Trends: The Evolving Landscape of Settlement Agreements in Employment
• Comparing Settlement Agreements with Other Employment Dispute Resolution Methods

Introduction

Settlement agreements provide a strategic, cost-effective, and legally binding resolution for employment disputes, benefiting both employers and employees by avoiding lengthy tribunal proceedings and ensuring certainty and confidentiality. This post explores key advantages, common mistakes, creation processes, statistical insights, myths, legal foundations, future trends, and comparisons with other dispute resolution methods to equip employers and employees with comprehensive understanding and actionable guidance.

The Win-Win Benefits of Settlement Agreements for Employers and Employees

Avoiding Pitfalls: Common Mistakes in Settlement Agreements and How to Recover

Settlement agreements in UK employment contexts are powerful tools but prone to costly errors if mishandled. These mistakes often arise during drafting, negotiation, or signing and can undermine the validity or fairness of the agreement.

Typical Errors in Settlement Agreements

• Lack of Independent Legal Advice: Employees commonly sign without seeking specialist advice, risking unrecognised rights or overlooking critical terms. Independent legal advice is a legal requirement to ensure the agreement’s enforceability and fairness.
• Ambiguous or Incomplete Language: Vague wording, especially about the scope of claims waived or confidentiality obligations, can lead to disputes. A poorly defined settlement may fail to release the employer fully or create confusion over obligations.
• Miscalculations in Financial Terms: Errors in calculating redundancy payments, bonuses, or benefits can result in underpayments or disputes later. Accurate, transparent financial details are essential.
• Ignoring Response Deadlines: Employees must respond within prescribed timeframes (typically 10 calendar days) after receiving the agreement. Missing this window can forfeit the offer or force continuation of contentious employment processes.
• Insufficient Consideration of Restrictive Covenants: Settlement agreements sometimes extend to post-termination restrictions affecting future employment. Overlooking these or failing to clarify terms can hamper the employee’s prospects unfairly.
• Signing Under Pressure or Without Time to Reflect: Signing too quickly under perceived pressure or without adequate time to consider independent advice can render the agreement vulnerable to challenge.

Practical Steps for Recovery and Remedy

1. Seek Immediate Legal Advice: If you suspect a mistake, consult an employment law specialist promptly. They can assess whether the error may invalidate the agreement or justify reopening negotiations.
2. Identify the Nature of the Mistake: Distinguish between mutual mistakes (both parties misunderstand), unilateral mistakes, or errors due to misrepresentation. Different legal remedies apply depending on the type.
3. Negotiate Amendments or Renegotiation: If errors relate to financial calculations or unclear terms, approach the other party to amend the agreement amicably. Employers often prefer resolving issues quickly rather than facing disputes.
4. Consider Legal Remedies: Where renegotiation fails, remedies can include rescission (voiding the agreement), damages for misrepresentation, or claims for breach of contract or unfair dismissal, depending on circumstances.
5. Document All Communications: Keep detailed records of discussions, offers, and responses related to the settlement. Documenting can strengthen your position in renegotiations or potential legal proceedings.
6. Request Additional Time If Needed: If pressured to sign, ask for extra time to seek advice. Employers responding reasonably will often extend consideration periods to ensure validity.

In summary, vigilance during drafting and signing combined with professional advice significantly reduces the risk of errors. When mistakes occur, timely legal consultation and clear communication open paths to practical remedies and renegotiations, helping avoid costly legal disputes and ensuring fair outcomes for both parties.

Avoiding Pitfalls: Common Mistakes in Settlement Agreements and How to Recover

Step-by-Step Guide to Creating an Effective Settlement Agreement

Creating a legally binding settlement agreement in the UK requires careful attention to statutory requirements and precise drafting to protect both parties. Below is a detailed process that covers the essential legal conditions, key clauses to include, and best practices to ensure the agreement is enforceable and fair.

Common Mistake	Why It’s a Problem	How to Avoid It

Not Seeking Independent Legal Advice

The agreement is not legally binding without certified legal advice, leaving both parties unprotected.

Always ensure the employee obtains independent legal advice from a qualified solicitor.

Using a Generic Template

Every case is unique — generic wording may fail to address specific circumstances or legal risks.

Tailor the agreement to reflect the individual’s situation, terms, and employer obligations.

Failing to Define ‘Full and Final Settlement’ Clearly

Ambiguous language can allow future claims, undermining the agreement’s purpose.

Use precise wording to confirm which claims are waived and which remain valid (e.g., pensions).

Omitting Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Clauses

Without these, either party could damage reputations post-agreement.

Include clear confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses covering both parties.

Not Accounting for Tax Implications

Incorrect tax treatment of payments (e.g., over £30,000) can result in unexpected liabilities.

Seek tax advice and structure payments in line with HMRC rules.

Overlooking Post-Termination Restrictions

Failing to address restrictive covenants can lead to confusion or unenforceable terms.

Review and reaffirm any restrictions on competition, solicitation, or confidentiality.

Rushing the Agreement

Pressure to conclude quickly can cause oversight of key terms and compliance issues.

Allow sufficient time for negotiation, review, and legal checks before signing.

Ignoring Employee Rights Under Statutory Law

An agreement cannot override statutory rights like unpaid wages or discrimination claims.

Ensure compliance with employment law and verify that statutory entitlements are met.

Poor Record Keeping After Signing

Missing documentation can cause disputes or compliance issues later.

Keep signed copies, proof of payments, and correspondence securely stored.

Legal Requirements for Validity

• Written form: The agreement must be in writing—verbal agreements hold no legal weight.
• Relevant claims specified: It must expressly relate to specific claims (e.g., unfair dismissal, discrimination), not a vague or broad waiver.
• Independent legal advice: The employee must receive advice from a qualified adviser such as a solicitor, barrister, or accredited trade union representative. This adviser must have professional indemnity insurance.
• Advisor details and certificate: The agreement must identify the independent adviser and include a signed certificate confirming that advice was provided.
• Statutory declaration: The agreement must state compliance with all legal conditions governing settlement agreements.

Key Clauses to Include

• Payment terms: Clearly specify the settlement amount, including any redundancy pay, payment in lieu of notice, accrued holiday pay, and the timing of payments. Highlight that payments up to £30,000 can be made tax-free under certain conditions.
• Termination details: State the date and nature of termination (e.g., resignation or dismissal) along with any handover arrangements.
• Confidentiality: Include a clause protecting sensitive information while ensuring it does not restrict lawful whistleblowing (public interest disclosures).
• Waiver of claims: Explicitly list all claims the employee agrees to waive to avoid ambiguity (e.g., unfair dismissal, discrimination, breach of contract). Clarify which claims cannot be waived, such as future personal injury claims.
• Reference provision: Agree on the content and provider of future work references if appropriate.
• Restrictive covenants (if applicable): Include reasonable restrictive clauses tailored to protect legitimate business interests, covering scope, duration, and geography.

Ensuring Enforceability and Employee Protection

An agreement becomes legally binding once it is signed by all parties, including the employee’s independent legal adviser, and properly dated. The mandatory legal advice ensures the employee fully understands the implications, safeguarding against unfair disadvantage. Key protections include tax-free treatment for eligible payouts and safeguarding whistleblowing rights. Non-compliance with legal requirements can render the agreement unenforceable.

Best Practices for Negotiation and Legal Consultation

1. Employer’s initial offer: Present clear and fair terms in writing.
2. Employee review period: Allow the employee sufficient time—typically at least 10 days—to consider the offer, which can be shortened only by mutual consent.
3. Negotiation: Encourage open discussion to amend clauses as needed to reflect fair outcomes.
4. Independent legal advice: The employee must consult a qualified legal adviser who explains the terms and consequences, particularly the waiver of tribunal claims.
5. Finalising the agreement: Once both parties agree to the terms and the adviser’s certificate is attached, the agreement can be signed and dated, ensuring legal enforceability.

Employers are also encouraged to draft agreements with specialist employment law assistance to ensure compliance and tailored protections. This thorough approach minimises future disputes, maximises clarity, and provides security to both employer and employee.

---

Step-by-Step Guide to Creating an Effective Settlement Agreement

Statistical Insights: How Settlement Agreements Shape Employment Dispute Resolution in the UK

Settlement agreements are a key mechanism for resolving employment disputes in the UK, offering both employers and employees a structured path to end conflicts without proceeding to costly and lengthy tribunal claims. Their prevalence, success rates, financial outcomes, and the role of confidentiality clauses reflect their growing importance in UK employment law.

Prevalence of Settlement Agreements

Settlement agreements represent a significant share of employment dispute resolutions. They account for around 24.2% of the most common employment claims, surpassing even dismissal and discrimination claims. The volume of cases handled through early conciliation by ACAS highlights this prevalence. Between April 2023 and March 2024, ACAS managed nearly 98,000 employee-led conciliation cases, with over 49,500 tribunal claims avoided during the conciliation stage. Of those avoided tribunal claims, more than 9,000 were directly settled through ACAS-mediated settlement agreements.

Success Rates and Implementation

Settlement agreements have a strong track record of success in preventing disputes from escalating to tribunals. Data shows that ACAS achieved settlement outcomes in 39% of early conciliation cases, exceeding their performance targets. Furthermore, about 76% of all claims during the referenced period did not progress to a final hearing. Notably, 70% of claims that did not proceed were settled through ACAS, with only a minority proceeding to tribunal hearings.

Once agreed, settlement agreements are effectively implemented in most cases, with a reported 90% full implementation rate. This high adherence rate reinforces the reliability of settlement agreements as a dispute resolution tool.

Financial Outcomes

Financial settlements vary based on the nature of the claim. Awards in tribunal cases provide a benchmark for understanding settlement agreement payouts, which typically aim to provide a fair and mutually agreeable resolution. Average tribunal awards give insight into potential financial outcomes:

• Unfair dismissal: approximately £13,700
• Race discrimination: around £29,500
• Sex discrimination: about £53,400
• Age discrimination: up to £102,900

Financial settlements within agreements are often negotiated to preempt these figures, providing certainty and saving parties from unpredictable tribunal awards, legal costs, and emotional strain.

Confidentiality Clauses in Settlement Agreements

Confidentiality remains a common and important element in settlement agreements, protecting the interests and reputations of both employers and employees. While the exact prevalence of confidentiality clauses has fluctuated slightly, their inclusion is a standard feature that contributes to the attractiveness of settlement agreements as a dispute resolution option. Such clauses ensure that the terms of settlement and details of the dispute remain private, which can be critical for maintaining ongoing business relationships and individual privacy.

Collectively, these statistics demonstrate the strategic role of settlement agreements in UK employment dispute resolution—reducing tribunal caseloads, offering financial predictability, ensuring dispute closure, and maintaining confidentiality.

---

Statistical Insights: How Settlement Agreements Shape Employment Dispute Resolution

Common Misconceptions About Settlement Agreements in Employment Law

Settlement agreements are often surrounded by myths that can mislead both employers and employees. Understanding the facts behind these misconceptions is essential to make informed decisions about using settlement agreements effectively and legally.

Settlement Agreements Always End Employment

It is a common assumption that settlement agreements solely serve to terminate employment. However, while many do end the employment relationship, these agreements can also be used to resolve specific disputes within ongoing employment. For example, they might settle a grievance or clarify terms without ending the contract. This flexibility is important as it offers tailored solutions that suit different circumstances rather than a one-size-fits-all approach.

Legal Formalities Are Not Necessary

Some believe that settlement agreements can be informal or verbal. In reality, UK law sets out strict formal requirements that must be met for a settlement agreement to be valid. The agreement must be in writing, explicitly state the disputes covered, and crucially, the employee must receive independent legal advice from a qualified adviser with professional indemnity insurance. Failure to follow these steps can render the agreement unenforceable, potentially leaving both parties exposed to future claims.

Negotiations Are Automatically Confidential

Another misconception is that all discussions around settlement agreements are confidential by default. Confidentiality usually applies only once the agreement is signed. Until then, either party could potentially disclose details, so it is important to agree explicitly on confidentiality terms during negotiation to protect sensitive information.

Settlement Payments Are Completely Tax-Free

Many expect that all payments made under a settlement agreement are tax-free. In practice, only payments up to £30,000 are typically exempt from tax. Any amount over that threshold may be subject to income tax and National Insurance contributions. Both employers and employees should understand these tax implications when negotiating and finalising the agreement.

Terms Cannot Be Negotiated

Settlement agreements are often seen as standard documents with fixed terms. Contrary to this belief, they are highly flexible instruments. Terms can be negotiated and customised based on the specific dispute and employment context. This might include arrangements around financial compensation, notice periods, pension impact, restrictive covenants, and confidentiality clauses.

Independent Legal Advice Is Optional

Perhaps the most critical myth is that employees do not need legal advice to sign a settlement agreement. Independent legal advice is a legal requirement designed to protect employees. The adviser must be a qualified professional with relevant indemnity insurance, and their role is to ensure the employee fully understands the agreement and its consequences. Without such advice, the agreement is unlikely to be valid and enforceable.

Recognising and addressing these misconceptions helps both employers and employees approach settlement agreements more confidently, ensuring compliance with legal standards and achieving fair outcomes.

---

Busting Myths: What You Really Need to Know About Settlement Agreements in Employment Law

Key Legal Principles Underpinning Settlement Agreements in UK Employment

Settlement agreements are legally binding contracts that formalise the resolution of employment disputes or end employment on mutually agreed terms. Their core purpose is to enable both parties to avoid costly and protracted litigation by agreeing a final settlement, with the employee waiving the right to bring future claims such as for unfair dismissal, discrimination, or redundancy disputes.

The use of settlement agreements is governed primarily by the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Equality Act 2010, supplemented by evolving case law and practice codes. Crucially, for a settlement agreement to be valid, several statutory conditions must be met. These include:

• Voluntary Agreement: The employee must agree to the terms freely, without coercion or undue influence.
• Written Form: The agreement must be documented in writing. Oral agreements do not qualify.
• Specific Advice: The employee must receive independent legal advice from a qualified adviser on the terms and implications of the agreement and the effect of waiving their rights.
• Clear Terms: The settlement must clearly state the claims being waived, the payment or benefits provided, and any other obligations.

Key clauses typically found in settlement agreements include:

• Settlement Sum: The financial compensation payable in exchange for waiver of claims.
• Confidentiality: Provisions preventing disclosure of the terms or circumstances of the settlement to third parties.
• Non-Disparagement: Agreements not to make damaging statements about the other party.
• References: Agreed wording or commitments for future employment references.

There are limits to what can be included or enforced, such as clauses attempting to waive statutory rights that cannot lawfully be excluded or imposing unreasonable restrictions on future employment without legitimate business justification.

Tax and Financial Implications

Payments received under settlement agreements can have varying tax treatments depending on their nature. Typically, compensation specifically for loss of office or injury to feelings may be tax-free up to certain thresholds, but sums representing salary or unpaid wages are taxable. Employers and employees should seek professional advice to understand the tax consequences fully and structure payments effectively.

Employee Rights and Protections During Settlement Negotiations

Employees retain their full statutory rights until a settlement agreement is signed and executed. Importantly, an employee is entitled to:

• Be accompanied during settlement discussions if they choose (for example, by a trade union representative or colleague).
• Take time to consider the agreement before signing, with a recommended minimum period to review and seek independent legal advice.
• Receive independent legal advice about the agreement’s impact, ensuring informed consent and protecting employee interests.

Failure to adhere to these protections may invalidate the agreement, leaving both parties exposed to further disputes.

Understanding these foundational legal parameters is essential for both employers and employees to navigate settlement agreements confidently and fairly, ensuring the process not only resolves disputes but protects rights and meets statutory standards.

Legal Foundations: Understanding the Basics of Settlement Agreements in Employment

Future Trends: The Evolving Landscape of Settlement Agreements in Employment

Significant changes loom on the horizon for settlement agreements in the UK, driven by legislative reforms, generational shifts, and rising employment disputes. The Employment Rights Bill 2025, expected to become law in autumn 2025, introduces major restrictions on non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) within settlement agreements. Crucially, any clause preventing employees from making allegations or disclosures of wrongdoing will be void, signalling a shift in power toward greater worker transparency and protection. Employers will need to revisit and revise settlement agreement templates to comply, distinguishing between permissible confidentiality provisions and those now prohibited. The Bill also indicates scope for specific exemptions relating to settlement agreements, though detailed secondary legislation is still awaited. These reforms represent a fundamental change in the confidentiality landscape around employment disputes and settlements, requiring employers to adapt swiftly to the new regulatory environment.

Generation Z employees are another key force reshaping settlement negotiations. This cohort, aged roughly 18-28, approaches settlement offers with enhanced proactivity and confidence, frequently negotiating outcomes 20-50% above initial offers. Motivated by job security, mental health considerations, fairness, and economic pressures such as the ongoing cost-of-living crisis, Gen Z workers strategically leverage data and social media insights to challenge low offers and secure improved financial and wellbeing terms. Unlike commonly held stereotypes, UK Gen Z employees notably maintain respect for managerial authority and value work as part of their identity, blending assertiveness with professionalism. Employers must respond to this shift by preparing for more robust, transparent, and data-driven negotiations, focusing holistically on compensation alongside workplace culture and mental health support.

Concurrent with these dynamics, employment disputes in the UK are rising sharply. Tribunal claims have increased by over 20% year-on-year in 2024, with active single claims climbing 30% compared to 2023. The volume of new claims, particularly around unfair dismissal, discrimination, and breach of contract, places significant pressure on tribunals and employers alike. ACAS continues to play a crucial role in early conciliation, resolving many disputes before tribunal hearings. However, the growing caseload and complexity of claims underscore the vital role of settlement agreements as a cost-effective dispute resolution mechanism. This heightens the need for employers to have compliant, clear, and fair agreements to expedite dispute resolution and avoid costly proceedings.

Alongside these challenges, the role of HR professionals is evolving. Currently, only solicitors, certified trade union officials, or authorised advisers can legally advise employees during settlement agreement negotiations. However, a proposed amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, backed by the CIPD, seeks to allow CIPD-certified independent HR consultants to provide such advice following specialised training. This change aims to expand access to affordable, expert advice, especially for employees in SMEs who may lack union representation. If enacted, this development will enable thousands more advisers trained under CIPD’s Code of Conduct to support fair and legally sound settlement processes. Employers should watch this space closely, as recognising HR professionals as authorised advisers could transform how settlement agreements are negotiated and finalised.

Together, these future trends—legal reform, Gen Z’s assertive negotiation style, rising dispute rates, and broadened advisory roles—will reshape how employers and employees navigate settlement agreements. Employers will benefit from pre-emptive adaptation by updating agreement templates, equipping HR teams for more complex advisories, and engaging constructively with the values and rights emerging among a new generation of workers. Meanwhile, employees stand to gain from enhanced transparency, more holistic negotiations, and increased support access, fostering more equitable and informed settlement outcomes in a changing UK employment landscape.

---

Future Trends: The Evolving Landscape of Settlement Agreements in Employment

Comparing Settlement Agreements with Other Employment Dispute Resolution Methods in the UK

Settlement agreements stand out as a popular and pragmatic approach to resolving employment disputes in the UK, offering distinct advantages when compared to mediation, arbitration, and litigation. These alternatives differ significantly in terms of cost, time, control, confidentiality, and finality—factors that influence their suitability for particular disputes.

Cost and Time Efficiency

Settlement agreements typically present a cost-effective solution. Employers generally cover the employee’s legal fees, as independent legal advice is a statutory requirement, reducing direct costs for the employee. The resolution often concludes within days or weeks, whereas employment tribunals can stretch over months or even years, demanding substantial costs in legal fees and lost productivity. Arbitration can be faster than litigation but involves arbitrator fees that may be considerable, while mediation remains relatively low cost and quicker but may require several sessions before resolution.

Control Over Outcome

Settlement agreements grant both parties substantial control, allowing them to negotiate terms that suit their unique circumstances, including financial compensation, references, or post-employment clauses. Mediation similarly offers high control since parties collaboratively shape outcomes with a facilitator’s guidance. Arbitration and litigation surrender control to third parties—the arbitrator or tribunal judge—who make the final decision.

Confidentiality and Finality

Confidentiality is a hallmark of settlement agreements, preserving reputations by avoiding public proceedings—a notable advantage over tribunals that are often public. Although arbitration and mediation also maintain confidentiality, settlement agreements include contractual confidentiality clauses offering strong protections, with allowances for whistleblowing. Finality is assured in settlement agreements once signed, binding parties and typically barring further claims related to the dispute. Arbitration decisions are similarly binding and harder to appeal than tribunal outcomes, which can be contested through appeals, extending dispute resolution timeframes.

Pros and Cons Summary

• Settlement Agreements: Cost-effective, quick, confidential, with high control and certainty. However, employees must waive legal claims and may face restrictive covenants limiting future work.
• Mediation: Voluntary, relationally oriented, preserving employment relationships and confidentiality. Yet, outcomes are not legally binding unless formalised, and resolution is not guaranteed.
• Arbitration: Binding, private, faster than court, offering legal certainty but at higher cost and with less party control over the outcome. Limited grounds for appeal.
• Litigation (Employment Tribunals): Provides authoritative legal determinations with appeal rights and legal precedent, suitable for complex or contested legal points. However, it is costly, slow, public, adversarial, and unpredictable.

Choosing the Best Approach

Employers and employees should consider their priorities: if confidentiality, speed, and cost-saving are paramount, settlement agreements often dominate. When preserving working relationships and exploring flexible solutions matter, mediation is preferable. Arbitration suits parties seeking final, binding decisions faster than courts but with less complexity. Litigation remains the last resort, suitable for disputes requiring formal legal adjudication where other methods fail or are inappropriate.

Understanding these trade-offs empowers both parties to select the best dispute resolution method for effective resolution tailored to their specific employment situation.

---

Comparing Settlement Agreements with Other Employment Dispute Resolution Methods

Practical Guidance and Benefits of Settlement Agreements for Employers and Employees

A UK settlement agreement is a legally binding contract between an employer and employee designed to resolve disputes or end employment on mutually agreed terms. Formerly called compromise agreements, these are commonly used in cases such as redundancies, allegations of misconduct, or other employment disputes where the employee agrees to waive rights to take legal action in return for compensation or other benefits.

Legal Requirements for a Valid Settlement Agreement

To be legally enforceable, a settlement agreement must comply with strict requirements set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996:

• It must be in writing and related to a specific complaint or employment dispute.
• The employee must receive independent legal advice from a qualified adviser—such as a solicitor, certified trade union official, or authorised advice centre representative—who carries professional indemnity insurance.
• The agreement must identify the independent adviser and confirm that the conditions regulating settlement agreements are met.

Without meeting these criteria, the agreement will not prevent the employee from pursuing claims in an employment tribunal.

Benefits for Employers

• Risk management: Settlement agreements help avoid costly and uncertain tribunal claims and litigation.
• Reputation protection: They provide a clear, confidential resolution with agreed terms on references and confidentiality clauses.
• Cost effectiveness: Compared to tribunal proceedings, settlement agreements reduce legal costs and time spent.
• Clean break: Both parties achieve finality, reducing ongoing risks or disputes.

Benefits for Employees

• Financial certainty: Employees typically receive enhanced severance payments above statutory entitlements.
• Clarity: Clear terms covering pay, notice periods, references, and confidentiality ease the uncertainty of termination.
• Faster, private resolution: Settlement agreements provide an expedient, less adversarial alternative to tribunals.
• Negotiated references: Employees often secure agreed positive references to support future employment prospects.

Practical Advice for Employers

• Use settlement agreements judiciously, not as a routine method for all terminations.
• Consider contributing to the employee’s legal advice costs, typically £350–£500 plus VAT, to promote fairness and trust.
• Seek your own legal advice to ensure compliance with all formal requirements.
• Allow employees reasonable time to consider the agreement—usually at least 10 calendar days.
• Avoid pressurising employees by threatening dismissal if they do not accept the agreement, as this can invalidate the contract.

Practical Advice for Employees

• Always obtain independent legal advice before signing, as this is legally compulsory.
• Review all clauses carefully, particularly those related to confidentiality and post-employment restrictions that might affect future work.
• Understand fully which claims you are waiving and negotiate the financial package if appropriate.
• Ensure any verbal promises, such as agreed reference wording, are included in the written agreement.
• Confirm the timescale and method for receiving any payments agreed.

By understanding these essentials, both employers and employees can use settlement agreements effectively to achieve fair, timely, and professional resolution to potential disputes or employment terminations.

Sources

• Lawson-West Solicitors – Top 5 Mistakes Made in Settlement Agreements
• Steen & Co Solicitors – Settlement Agreements
• Cripps – Settlement Agreements: Avoiding the Pitfalls
• ACAS – Settlement Agreements Guide
• Fitzgerald HR – Settlement Agreements
• Aston Solicitors – Settlement Agreement Essentials
• Thompsons Solicitors – What is a Settlement Agreement?
• LexisNexis UK – Settlement Agreements in Employment